اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

ارزیابی عملکرد تعاونی‌های شالی‏کوبی‌داران گیلان و ارائه راهکارهای توسعه خدمات آنها : بررسی موردی تعاونی‌های تالش، صومعه‌سرا، پیربازار و آستانه اشرفیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مکانیزاسیون، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
2 استادیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی‬، دانشگاه گیلان.رشت، ایران.
چکیده
امروزه، لزوم و ضرورت نهادینه‌سازی فعالیت‌های کشاورزی در قالب سازمآنها ی کشاورزی در بین کارشناسان و متخصصان پذیرفته شده است. بی‌شک، شکل‌گیری تشکل‌های توانمند، ضمن آنکه با دیدگاه‌های جدید در خصوص حقوق مردم سازگارتر است، به‏‌طور بالقوه، می‌تواند به‏‌عنوان ابزاری برای سپردن امور مردم به خود آنها عمل کند و فرصت لازم را برای پرداختن دستگاه‌های دولتی به وظایف اصلی خود فراهم آورد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی راهکارهای توانمندسازی شالی‏کوبی‌­داران استان گیلان انجام پذیرفت و بدین منظور، از روش دلفی و برای رتبه‌­بندی راهکارها نیز از روش‌­های تصمیم­‌گیری چندشاخصه SAW و TOPSIS استفاده شد. بر اساس نتایج به‌‏دست‏آمده، 34 راهکار برای توانمندسازی شالی‏کوبی‌­داران توسط کارشناسان طی سه مرحله انجام روش دلفی شناسایی شد که در دو گروه راهکارهای درون‌سازمانی با سه زیربخش و راهکارهای برون‌‌سازمانی با دو زیربخش دسته‌­بندی شدند. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که مهم‏ترین راهکارهای توانمندسازی عبارت‌‏اند از تولید برخی نهاده‌های مصرفی کارخانه‌ها توسط تعاونی­‌ها، خرید جمعی نهاده‌ها، خرید وسایل و قطعات برای اعضا توسط تعاونی، ارتقای سطح مدیریت اعضا در تعاونی‏‌های شالی‏کوبی، در نظر گرفتن اعتبار با نرخ بهره کم توسط دولت برای تعاونی‌­ها و تمدید پروانه­‌ها از طریق تعاونی. راهکارهای شناسایی‌‏شده را می‌­توان به‌‏عنوان پیشنهادهایی قلمداد کرد که شایسته است با برنامه­‌ریزی اصولی، زمینه اجرایی شدن آنها فراهم شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluating the Performance of Rice-Miller Cooperatives in Guilan Province of Iran and providing the Solutions to Develop Services: A Case study of Cooperatives of Talesh, Soomehsara, Pirbazar, and Astaneh Ashrafiyeh

نویسندگان English

Seyed Hosein Peyman 1
Reza Esfanjari Kenari 2
1 Associate Professor of Agricultural Mechanization, Department of Agricultural Mechanization, University of Guilan, Rasht. Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan. Rasht, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Today, institutionalization of agricultural activities in the form of agricultural organizations has become a basic need, especially in developing countries. Given the numerous challenges that modern agriculture faces, including climate change, depletion of natural resources, and the need to increase food production for a growing population, the establishment of agricultural organizations can serve as an effective and sustainable solution to improve the agricultural situation and livelihoods of farmers. Agricultural organizations can enhance cooperation among members while also boosting the productivity and quality of agricultural products through advisory, educational, and technical services. These institutions can provide access to new markets for producers by creating efficient supply chains. On the other hand, by delegating some responsibilities to agricultural organizations, government agencies can focus more on their core tasks and missions. This not only enhances government efficiency, but also reduces administrative and bureaucratic burdens. Ultimately, institutionalizing the agricultural activities through the agricultural organizations can contribute to sustainable rural development and alleviate poverty in rural areas.
 Materials and Methods: This study aimed at identifying the empowerment strategies for rice farmers in Guilan province of Iran. For this purpose, the Delphi method was used and the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods including SAW and TOPSIS were used to rank the identified strategies. Based on the results obtained, 34 strategies for empowering rice farmers were identified by experts through three stages of the Delphi method, which were categorized into two groups: intra-organizational strategies with three sub-categories and extra-organizational strategies with two sub-categories.
Results and Discussion: Based on the study results, the following strategies are of primary importance: the production of certain factory inputs by cooperatives, collective purchasing of inputs, procurement of equipment and parts for members, enhancing the management skills of rice cooperative members, providing low-interest credit for cooperatives by the government, and renewing licenses through cooperatives. The production of consumer inputs by cooperatives can help reduce production costs and cooperatives will be able to control the quality of products. The collective purchasing of inputs by cooperatives also increases bargaining power in the market and can lead to a decrease in the final price of products. Enhancing the management skills of members of rice cooperatives through continuous training and specialized advice can significantly impact the efficiency and productivity of these cooperatives. In addition, renewing licenses through cooperatives can streamline administrative processes and reduce bureaucracy. This measure can also provide greater job security for cooperative members and boost their motivation to be more active.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The solutions presented in this study not only help improve the performance of cooperatives, but can also have significantly positive impacts on the entire rice and agricultural industry. Furthermore, the government can facilitate better access to finance by offering low-interest credit to cooperatives. This can facilitate investments in new equipment, enhance infrastructure, and foster the development of innovative projects. Low-interest financial options can also motivate members to invest in improving their production methods. Ultimately, implementing these solutions requires cooperation between the government, NGOs, and the private sector. Supporting cooperatives should be considered as a key strategy in sustainable agricultural development and increasing farmers’ welfare. By strengthening cooperatives and enhancing their capabilities, it is possible to contribute to the economic and social growth of rural areas and ensure food security for the whole society.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Rice-Miller Cooperatives
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods
Delphi Method
Performance Evaluation
  • Agrawal, R., Raju, K., Reddy, K., Srinivasan, R., & Sriram, M. S. (2002) Member-funds and cooperative performance? Journal of Rural Development, 22(1), 1-17. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5113465_Member-funds_and_Cooperative_Performance.
  • Ahmadpour, A., Mokhtari, V., & Poursaeed, A. R. (2014). Measuring level of success in agricultural production cooperatives in Ilam province. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 2(8), 27-44. [In Persian]
  • Ahmadzadeh, S. (2020). Determining the environmental efficiency of rice farmers of the Guilan province with emphasis on directional nutrient surplus. PhD Thesis, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran. [In Persian]
  • Azizpourfard, F., Ghobadi Aliabadi, S., & Sedighi, H. (2016). Factors affecting the success of dairy farmer's cooperatives in Kouhdasht County of Iran. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 4(15), 1-15. [In Persian]
  • Baniasadi, M., & Gholifar, A. (2011). Ranking the effective factors on success of agricultural cooperatives of Zanjan province. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Sustainable Rural Development, 6-7 July, 2011, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. [In Persian]
  • Boozarjomehri, D. K., & Hadizadeh Bazaz, M. (2013). Analyzing the effective structures on development of the rural producing cooperatives in Razavi Khorasan province (from the view point of experts). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 3(8), 85-100. DOI: 10.22111/gaij.2013.1288. [In Persian]
  • Borda-Rodriguez, A., & Vicari, S. (2014). Rural co-operative resilience: the case of Malawi. Journal of Cooperative Organization and Management, 2(1), 1-11.
  • Castellini, M. (2014). Stakeholder theory and strategic management in third sector: an analysis on Italian cooperative associations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4498-4504.
  • De Alessi, M., Sullivan, J. M., & Hilborn, R. (2014). The legal, regulatory, and institutional evolution of fishing cooperatives in Alaska and the west coast of the United States. Marine Policy, 43, 217-225.
  • Develtere, P., Pollett, I., & Wanyama, F., (2008). Renaissance of African cooperatives in the 21rt century: lessons from the field (Chapter 2). In: Cooperating out of poverty: the renaissance of the African cooperative movement. Governance and Social Development Resource Centre.
  • Downinga, M., Timothy, A., & Volkb Dean, A.,(2005). Development of new generation cooperatives in agriculture for renewable energy research, development, and demonstration projects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(5), 425-434.
  • Haji, L., Chizari, M., & Choobchian, S. (2016). Structural analysis of factors affecting the sustainable development of agricultural production cooperatives in rural areas of Naghadeh County. Journal of Rural Research, 7(1), 195-216. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2016.58392. [In Persian]
  • Hashemi, F., Malekmohammadi, I., & Movahed Mohammadi, H. (2012). A survey of factors influencing managers’ knowledge of and awareness from cooperative sector (a case study of agricultural cooperatives in Tehran province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 42-2(4), 655-667. DOI: 10.22059/ijaedr.2012.28595. [In Persian]
  • Heydari, F., Naderi Mahdiei, K., Yaghoubi Farani, A., & Heydari, A. (2015). Identifying successful indicators for agricultural cooperatives. Co-Operation and Agriculture,14(4), 39-60. [In Persian]
  • Karim M H. (2015). Challenges of Iran's rural cooperative networks. Space Economy and Rural Development (SERD), 4(13), 173-196. Available at http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2575-fa.html. [In Persian]
  • Latifi, S., & Yaghoubi Farani, A. (2017). Identifying and ranking strategies for empowering the poultry cooperatives in Hamedan province by using MCDM techniques. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 30(3), 160-172. DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v30i3.46259. [In Persian]
  • MAJ (2022). Agricultural statistics. Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), Tehran. Available at amar.maj.ir. [In Persian]
  • Mateos-Ronco, A., & Lajara-Camilleri, N. (2014). Capital structure and financing decisions of agricultural cooperatives: Spanish evidence. 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France169687, Agricultural Economics Society.
  • Nkhoma, A. T. (2011). Factors affecting sustainability of agricultural cooperatives: lessons from Malawi. Doctoral Dissertation of Agricommerce, Massey University, New Zealand, March, 2011.
  • Ostadi, H., & Alizadeh, A. (2009). Exploring ways to support the formation and development of cooperatives through bank lending, case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. Taavon (Socio-Econ & Cultu), 20(206-207), 47-58. [In Persian]
  • PBOGP (2017). Statistical information on rice threshing factories in Guilan province. Planning and Budget Organization of Guilan Province (PBOGP), Rasht, Iran. Available at https://sdb.mpogl.ir/statistic/public. [In Persian]
  • Sylvia, G., Cusack, C., & Swanson, J. (2014). Fishery cooperatives and the Pacific whiting conservation cooperative: lessons and application to non-industrial fisheries in the Western Pacific. Marine Policy, 44, 65-71.
  • UWCC (2006). Farmer's cooperative and the city of Keota, Iowa: a case study. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperative (UWCC). Available at http://www.uwcc.wisc.edu/info/fra/keota.html.