اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

مطالعه تطبیقی نظام‌‏های کشاورزی ایران و ژاپن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
استادیار موسسه پژوهش‌های برنامه ریزی، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه روستایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
نظام‌‏های کشاورزی دو کشور ایران و ژاپن، با توجه به ویژگی‌های جغرافیایی، فرهنگی و اقتصادی متفاوت، از جنبه‌های فراوان قابل مقایسه و بررسی است. ایران، با تنوع اقلیمی و منابع طبیعی غنی، به‌عنوان یک کشور کشاورزی با سابقه تاریخی طولانی شناخته می‌شود، در حالی که ژاپن، با مساحت کوچک‌‏تر و محدودیت‌های منابع طبیعی، با بهره‌گیری از فناوری‏‌های پیشرفته و نظام‌های نوین کشاورزی توانسته است بهره‌وری بالایی را در این بخش به‏‌دست آورد. با این رویکرد، در مطالعة حاضر، به بررسی روش‌ها، چالش‌ها و دستاوردهای هر دو کشور در زمینه کشاورزی پرداخته و با شناسایی نقاط قوت و ضعف هر کدام، راهکارهایی برای بهبود فرآیندها و نظام‌های کشاورزی ایران ارائه شد؛ همچنین، از روش تحقیق تطبیقی برای مقایسه برخی از ابعاد دو نظام استفاده شد. منابع مورد استفاده عمدتاً مربوط به سازمان فائو و سازمان توسعه و همکاری اقتصادی (OECD) بود. نتایج مطالعة حاضر نشان داد که با توجه به تفاوت شرایط دو کشور، سیاست‌های کشاورزی در آنها سمت و سویی متفاوت دارد. در ایران، رویکردی مبتنی بر یارانه برای مصرف‏‌کننده اتخاذ شده که هدف آن تثبیت قیمت‌ها و تضمین امنیت غذایی است. در مقابل، ژاپن بر سیاست‌گذاری مبتنی بر شواهد و پایداری تأکید دارد که تعهد به پایداری، حفاظت از محیط‌زیست و نوآوری‌های فناوری در بخش کشاورزی را نشان می‌دهد. ژاپن تلاش کرده است تا محدودیتهای شدید بخش کشاورزی را با افزایش بهره‌­وری جبران نماید و سیاست‌های آن عموماً با مشارکت کشاورزان و روستاییان طراحی می‌شود. تأکید بیشتر کشور ژاپن بر جلوگیری و کاهش ضایعات مواد غذایی موجب شده است تا وابستگی قطعی این کشور به منابع بیرونی غذا کمتر شود. یکی از مهم‌ترین پیشنهادهای سیاستی مقاله پیش رو، تنظیم سازوکارهای رسمی برای ایجاد فرصت مشارکت واقعی کشاورزان در برنامه‌­ریزی و سیاست‌گذاری بخش کشاورزی است. همچنین جلب مشارکت گسترده مردم در شهرها و روستاها برای کاهش ضایعات و تلفات با ترویج آموزه‌­های فرهنگی و تاریخی می‌تواند از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Comparative study of the agricultural systems in Iran and Japan

نویسندگان English

SMJ Esfahani Esfahani
Shohreh Soltani
Assistant Professor of the Agricultural and Rural Development Group, APERDRI, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction:
Food security is of great importance in both countries, Iran and Japan. Agricultural systems in both countries are examples of the complex interaction between cultural heritage and modern needs. Both Japan and Iran have rich agricultural histories that are deeply connected to their unique cultural and environmental contexts. Therefore, these two countries were studied comparatively in this paper.

Materials and Methods: The case-oriented comparative method was used in this research. Comparative studies are a very important method in social science studies for the purpose of comparison between countries. In this study, important information on the agricultural sector of the two countries was considered. Among different dimensions of the agricultural sector, some indicators including the general characterizatrion of the agricultural sector in two countries, major agricultural products, agricultural product performance, gross value of agricultural production, greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption, nitrate fertilizer consumption, agricultural governance system, and finally their governance systems were studied and compared.

Results and discussion: Given the different circumstances of the two countries, the agricultural policies of Iran and Japan have different directions. Iran has adopted a subsidy-based approach that aims to stabilize prices and ensure food security. In contrast, Japan emphasizes evidence-based and sustainable policymaking that demonstrates a commitment to sustainability, environmental protection, and technological innovation. Japan has attempted to compensate for severe constraints in the agricultural sector by increasing productivity, and its policies are generally designed with the participation of farmers and villagers. Japan’s emphasis on waste managemenr and reduction of food loss has led to the reduced dependence on external food sources.

Conclusion and suggestions: The agricultural sector in Iran has many natural advantages over Japanese agriculture. Both Japan and Iran are embracing technological advances to improve their agricultural sectors, but they are doing so in different contexts, influenced by their unique challenges and goals. The integration of technologies allows for more efficient usage of resources and better crop management, and responds to issues related to labor shortages and urbanization. In contrast, Iran’s agricultural strategy focuses on adopting sustainable practices and improving traditional farming methods to address its unique challenges, such as water scarcity and market volatility. A focus on sustainability is crucial in a country where access to water has always been a serious challenge. In addition, investments in advanced technologies, such as precision agriculture, are gradually being integrated into Iranian farming practices. However, the country still faces obstacles such as limited access to modern infrastructure.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agricultural System
Iran
Japan
Agricultural Development
Rural Development
1.      Ajami, A. I. (2005). From peasant to farmer: A study of agrarian transformation in an Iranian village, 1967-2002. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743805052104.
2.      Barłóg, P. (2023). Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency—Methods and Strategies for the Future. Plants, 12(20), 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203658
3.      FAO (2025). FAOSTAT Online Database. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV
4.      Farris, W. (2017). Rice, Agriculture, and the Food Supply in Premodern Japan by Charlotte von Verschuer. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 43, 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.2017.0008.
5.      Fuhrmann-Aoyagi, M. B., Miura, K., & Watanabe, K. (2024). Sustainability in Japan’s agriculture: An analysis of current approaches. Sustainability, 16(2), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020596.
6.      Ghanavati, F., & Mashayekh, J. (2022). Methodological Foundations in Comparative Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 15(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.22034/JSTP.2022.13944. [In Persian]
7.      Ishikawa, T., Fukui, S., Fujita, J., Fujikawa, A., Iwahara, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2022). Factors Related to End-of-Life Care Discussions Among Community-Dwelling People in Japan. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 63(4), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.011.
8.      Kohsaka, R., & Kohyama, S. (2022). State of the art review on land-use policy: Changes in forests, Agricultural lands and renewable energy of Japan. Land, 11(5), 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050624.
9.      Koocheki, A., & Ghorbani, R. (2005). Traditional agriculture in Iran and development challenges for organic agriculture. International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management, 1(1). 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451590509618079.
10.   Li, N., Jiang, Y., Mu, H., & Yu, Z. (2018). Efficiency evaluation and improvement potential for the Chinese agricultural sector at the provincial level based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). Energy, 164, 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2018.08.150
11.   Maleksaeidi, H., Jalali, M., & Eskandari, F. (2021). Challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in the west of Iran: Viewpoint of agricultural experts. Sustainability, 13(6), 3537. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13063537.
12.   Nishi, M. (2022). Japanese land reform in the new era? Farmers’ wellbeing and sustainable farmland management. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(3), 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221138711 (Original work published 2023).
13.   OECD. (2019). Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in Japan. https://doi.org/10.1787/92B8DFF7-EN
14.   OECD. (2021). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2021 (Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/2D810E01-EN.
15.   Riehl, S., Zeidi, M., & Conard, N. J. (2013). Emergence of agriculture in the foothills of the Zagros mountains of Iran. Science, 341(6141), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236743.
16.   Saeediankia, A., Majdzadeh, R., Haghighian-Roudsari, A., & Pouraram, H. (2023). The effects of subsidies on foods in Iran: A narrative review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 1053851. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSUFS.2022.1053851/BIBTEX.
17.   Salem, B. (2012). Investigating the production and commercial trend of agriculture in Iran and selected countries with regard to the trade liberalization of the last decade,. Economic Journal, Monthly Review of Generations and Economic Policies, 4(5), 39–60. [In Persian]
18.   Sato, A. (2024). List of Japanese historical periods | 15 important periods in Japanese history. Japan Truly. Available at https://japantruly.com/japanese-historical-periods.
19.   Taleb, M., & Najafi asl, Z. (2009). Agricultural development or rural development? Similarities and Conflicts of Agricultural Policies in Iran and Japan. Iranian Journal of Anthropology. 2(10), 69–96. https://sid.ir/paper/66342/en. [In Persian]
20.   Tubiello, F. N., Karl, K., Flammini, A., Gütschow, J., Obli-Laryea, G., Conchedda, G., Pan, X., Qi, S. Y., Halldórudóttir Heiðarsdóttir, H., Wanner, N., Quadrelli, R., Rocha Souza, L., Benoit, P., Hayek, M., Sandalow, D., Mencos Contreras, E., Rosenzweig, C., Rosero Moncayo, J., Conforti, P., & Torero, M. (2022). Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems. Earth System Science Data, 14(4), 1795–1809. https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-14-1795-2022.
21.   Yamashita, K. (2022). What is behind the moves to revise the Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas Basic Act? | The Canon Institute for Global Studies. https://cigs.canon/en/article/20221109_7095.html.
22.   Yamashita, K. (2023). Time to overhaul Japan’s post-war agricultural policy and administration | The Canon Institute for Global Studies. https://cigs.canon/en/article/20230125_7237.html.
23.   Zarandi, S. (2024). An overview of comparative research methods: theories, approaches and perspectives. Comparative Public Administration, 1(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22098/cpa.2024.14476.1029. [In Persian]