اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

شناسایی و بررسی موانع گسترش اقتصاد چرخشی در بخش کشاورزی استان کردستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقنصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.
2 نویسنده مسئول و استادیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقنصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران
3 دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.
چکیده
در حال حاضر، بیشتر الگو‌های تولید و توزیع در بخش کشاورزی ایران و استان کردستان بر اساس روش «اقتصاد خطی» عمل می‌کنند، بدین معنی که پس از بهره­‌برداری از منابع طبیعی و تولید محصول نهایی، بخش زیادی از منابع و محصول به‏‌صورت آلوده و ضایعات از چرخه اقتصاد خارج می­‌شوند. الگوی اقتصاد چرخشی در کشاورزی بر استفاده مجدد از ضایعات محصول و نهاده‌­های هدررفته تأکید دارد، به‌گونه‌ای که فشار بر منابع طبیعی کاهش و کشاورزی پایدار تحقق یابد. با این رویکرد، در مطالعه حاضر، به بررسی نقش و اهمیت اقتصاد چرخشی در بخش کشاورزی و موانع گسترش آن در استان کردستان پرداخته شد. بدین منظور، پس از مرور مطالعات پیشین، عوامل و مؤلفه‌­های چالش‌­زا و موانع احتمالی توسعه اقتصاد چرخشی در استان کردستان شناسایی و بررسی شدند. اطلاعات مورد نیاز از طریق پرسشنامه خبرگان در سال 1403 گردآوری و با بهره‌­گیری از مدل ساختاری تفسیری، بررسی و تحلیل شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که بی‌‏سوادی و کم‏‌سوادی کشاورزان، کشاورزی سنتی و معیشتی و نیز کوچکی و پراکندگی مزارع کشاورزی چالش‌­های کلیدی گسترش اقتصاد چرخشی در بخش کشاورزی استان کردستان به‏‌شمار می‌­آیند. بر اساس یافته‌­های مطالعه حاضر، پیشنهاد می‌شود که با اتخاذ سازوکارهای کلان و بلندمدت، انگیزه فعالیت نسل جوان باسواد و تحصیل‏کرده استان در بخش کشاورزی تقویت شود؛ افزون بر این، لازم است که سیاست‏گذاران این بخش برای تحول نظام بهره‏‌برداری سنتی و دهقانی مبتنی بر کشاورزی دیم در استان کردستان تدبیری بلندمدت بیندیشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and Examining the Barriers to Expanding the Circular Economy in the Agricultural Sector of Kurdistan Province, Iran

نویسندگان English

Kiana Bahmanzad 1
Mahmood Haji-Rahimi 2
Hamed Ghaderzadeh 3
1 MSc. Student, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj. Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj. Iran.
3 Asociate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj. Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Current agricultural production and distribution systems including those in Kurdistan province of Iran, largely operate within a “linear economy” framework. This approach is characterized by the exploitation of natural resources for production, with a considerable portion of these resources ultimately lost as waste, becoming contaminated and exiting the economic cycle. In contrast, the Circular Economy (CE) model in agriculture seeks to recycle waste products and recover lost inputs, reducing dependency on resource exploitation and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. The CE model aims to minimize waste and make optimal use of resources through a regenerative approach, in stark contrast to the linear model typical of traditional capitalist economies. In the linear approach, the production and consumption chain generally follow a pattern of raw material extraction, production, consumption, and disposal, with residual waste discarded to accommodate further consumption. Adopting a circular economy perspective is particularly vital in agriculture and natural resource sectors, especially as population growth continues to increase food demand globally and the same is true for Iran, including its Kurdistan province. The urgency to adopt circular practices is underscored by the finite availability of agricultural inputs and natural resources, particularly water, which are increasingly scarce.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in Kurdistan province to facilitate a deeper understanding of the challenges and transitions necessary to implement a circular agricultural economy. Following a comprehensive review of relevant literature and expert feedback, relevant factors and components were identified as potential obstacles to adopting a CE model in Kurdistan. These factors were then analyzed using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach, a structured methodology that assesses interrelationships between criteria and indicators by categorizing them into multiple levels. The ISM helps delineate the levels of interconnections among dependent and independent indicators, either individually or in groups, allowing for a thorough analysis of the relationships among various aspects defined for the study. Initially, the ISM organizes the influential factors across different levels, then elucidates the relationships among these factors across each level. For data collection, a questionnaire based on the ISM principles was designed. 
Results and Discussion: The analysis revealed that three critical factors including illiteracy and/or low literacy levels among farmers, reliance on traditional and subsistence farming, and the fragmented and small-scale nature of agricultural plots in Kurdistan province were pivotal challenges within the circular agricultural economy. As shown by the study results, the concerned factors, identified as key variables by experts and interview participants, had the potential to influence other variables and reduce the barriers to implementing a circular agricultural economy in the region. A similar study by Dziedzic et al. (2022) underscores the importance of educating and informing the agricultural workforce about the CE model.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The study findings highlighted the necessity of involving a younger educated generation in agriculture through extensive long-term initiatives to achieve sustainable development and effectively implement the CE model in agricultural regions of developing countries like Iran. This transformation requires a shift from traditional and subsistence farming to a modern commercial agricultural framework that addresses the economic and structural inefficiencies of small-scale farming. Such a shift would enable the integration of innovative CE practices such as waste reduction, resource optimization, and enhanced input-output cycles known to be essential for sustainable agricultural systems in the long term.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Circular Agricultural Economy
Interpretive Structural Model (ISM)
Kurdistan (Province of Iran)
  • Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2013). Soft operations research. industrial Management Organization Publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Abedi, M. (2022). Modeling barriers to adoption of circular economy and Fourth Industrial Revolution in Agricultural Supply Chain using hybrid ISM-DEMATEL methodology. MA Thesis of Industrial Management-Performance Management, Islamic Azad University, Faculty of Humanities, Sabzevar, Iran. [In Persian]
  • Caraiani, P. (2012). Stylized facts of business cycles in a transition economy in time and frequency. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2163-2173.
  • Chang, K. F., Lin, C. T., & Bin, Y. Q. (2024). Harmony with nature: Disentanglement the influence of ecological perception and adaptation on sustainable development and circular economy goals in country. Heliyon, 10(4), e26034.
  • Davoodabadi, M. , Sajadifar, S. H., Ghane, A., & Shalpoush, S. (2018). Wastewater circular economy approach in sustainable development. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development4(2), 1-12. DOI: 10.22067/jwsd.v4i1.1.65197. [In Persian]
  • Dziedzic, M., Gomes, P. R., Angilella, M., Asli, A. E., Berger, P., Charmier, A. J., Chen, Y. C., Dasanayake, R., Dziedzic, R., Ferro, F., Huising, D., Knaus, M., Mahichi, F., Rachidi, F., Rocha, C., Smith, K., & Tsukada, S. (2022). International circular economy strategies and their impacts on agricultural water use. Cleaner Engineering and Technology8, Article 100504. DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100504.
  • Ebrahimi, M., Kazemi, H., Mirbagheri, S. A., & Rockaway, T. D. (2016). An optimized biological approach for treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater. Journal of Environment Chemical Engineering, 4(3), 3401-3408
  • FAO (2021). How to feed the world in 2050? Available at https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf.
  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. (2017). The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
  • Hassaniyan, A., & Sohrabi M. (2022). Colonial management of Iranian Kurdistan; with emphasis on water resources. Journal of World Systems Research, 28, 320-343.
  • Kiani, M., Andalib Ardekani, D., Mirfakhraddin, S. H., & Zare Ahmadabadi, H. (2023). An analysis of barriers to implementing circular economy and Fourth Industrial Revolution in Agricultural Supply Chain: a hybrid approach of FRM and Fuzzy DENP. Available at https://civilica.com/doc/1894198. [In Persian]
  • Kumar, A., & Singh, V. (2019). Overview of interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(5), 536-540. Available at http://www.ijeast.com.
  • Kumar, M., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. J., & Choubey, V. K. (2022). Performance assessment of circular driven sustainable agri-food supply chain towards achieving sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133698.
  • Lee, D. M. (2007). Structured decision making with interpretive structural modeling: implementing the core of interactive management. Sorach, Incorporated, 180 pp.
  • MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2, 23-44.
  • Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: What is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 315-328. DOI: 10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z.
  • Malek-Saeedi, H., & Memarbashi, P. (2023). An investigation of barriers to green entrepreneurship development in the agricultural sector of Kurdistan province from the perspective of agricultural experts Agriculture-Jahad Organization. Research Project Report, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj. [In Persian]
  • Mehrabi, A., Mahdipour, Z., Nisi, A., & Hessibi, P. (2022). Analysis of sustainable supply chain barriers in agriculture sector of Khuzestan province based on circular economy and industry 4.0. Proceedings of the Third National and Second International Conference on Business Sustainability, Ahvaz. Available at https://civilica.com/doc/1645150. [In Persian]
  • Nuñez-Cacho P., Górecki, J., Molina-Moreno, V., Corpas-Iglesias, F. A. (2018). What gets measured, gets done: development of a circular economy measurement scale for building industry. Sustainability, 10(7), 2340. DOI: 10.3390/ su10072340.
  • SCI (2023). Farm area and access to modern irrigation systems in Kurdistan province, Iran. Statistical Center of Iran (SCI), Tehran. Available at https://www.sci.ir. [In Persian]
  • Ubabukoh, C. L., & Imai, K. S. (2023). Are farmers ‘efficient but poor’? The impact of crop choices on technical efficiency and poverty in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1), 191-213.
  • Warfield, J. N. (1974). Structuring complex systems. Battelle Monograph No 4, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.