اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

اقتصاد کشاورزی و روستایی

سنجش تغییرات ساختاری در ترجیحات واردکنندگان خرمای ایران: مطالعه موردی فدراسیون روسیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌‏آموخته دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران. ایران
چکیده
انتظار بر این بوده است که از سال 2014،  با تحریم‌های غرب علیه کشور روسیه و اقدام متقابل این کشور، الگوی ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان این کشور دچار تغییراتی شود. بررسی رفتار عقلایی و ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان کشور روسیه در قبال کالاهای داخلی یا خارجی، با توجه به دریافتن اثرگذاری تکانه‌ها و سیاست‌ها به ‎صورت شکست ساختاری یا تغییر در ترجیحات افراد حائز اهمیت است. از این‏‌رو، در مطالعه حاضر، پایداری و شکست ساختاری ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان این کشور برای محصول خرما با استفاده از روش ناپارامتری بر مبنای اصل ضعیف ترجیحات آشکارشده (WARP)، اصل قوی ترجیحات آشکارشده (SARP) و اصل تعمیم‌یافته ترجیحات آشکارشده (GARP) بررسی شد و آنگاه آزمون فرضیه یادشده انجام گرفت. در این راستا، داده‌های قیمت و مقدار مربوط به واردات خرما به روسیه از مبادی عمده وارداتی شامل کشورهای ایران، تونس و الجزایر با بیشترین میزان صادرات این محصول به روسیه در دوره زمانی 20-2002 بررسی شد. نتایج مطالعه نشان داد که اصل WARP بیانگر هفت جفت نقض در سال‌های 2007 و 2008 بوده و نتایج اصول SARP و GARP نیز بیانگر وجود 132 مورد نقض در داده‌­هاست. همچنین، نتایج آماره کروسکال- والیس (K-W) نشان داد که مقدار محاسبه‌شده این آماره در دوره 19-2016 از مقدار بحرانی آماره کی‏دو (2χ) بزرگ‏تر است و فرض صفر مبنی بر شکست ساختاری در سال مورد نظر پذیرفته می‌شود؛ و بر مبنای اصل WARP، شکستی در ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان خرما در روسیه رخ داده است. نتایج نهایی محاسبه آماره K-W بر مبنای اصول قوی و تعمیم‌­یافته ترجیحات آشکارشده (SARP و GARP) نیز نشان داد که شکست ساختاری در ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان برای سبد کالایی خرما بر اثر تکانه غیرخطی موقت نبوده، بلکه ناشی از شکست ساختاری واقعی در ترجیحات مصرف‌کنندگان خرما در روسیه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Measuring Structural Changes in Preferences of Iranian Date Importers: A Case Study of Russian Federation

نویسندگان English

fatemh sakhi 1
Seyed Safdar Hosseini 2
1 PhD Graduate in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of ‎Tehran. Iran.‎
چکیده English

Introduction: Since Russia's conflict with Ukraine, which began in late February 2014, international sanctions have been imposed by the United States, the European Union (EU) and some other countries as well as international organizations against Russia and Crimea including Russian individuals, professional sectors, and officials. ‏The extensive U.S. sanctions against Russia have been imposed since 2014 after the Western-oriented government came to power in Ukraine, and so far, Washington has imposed more than 75 packages of economic and financial sanctions, as well as sanctions against Russian officials. The European Union, following in the footsteps of the United States, has imposed sanctions packages on Russia and still renews them every six months. Russia has also imposed sanctions on a number of countries, including Australia, Canada, Norway, Japan, the United States, and the European Union, regarding a complete ban on food imports. According to a 2023 report by the World Trade Organization, in 2022, Russia has shifted its import pattern to non-Western countries after Western sanctions. Russia's climate limits its ability to produce some agricultural products, making imports necessary to meet domestic demand. This is especially true for tropical crops such as dates, which cannot be cultivated in Russia due to its cold climate. As a result, Russia needs imports to supply its consumed dates. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Russia does not have production statistics on the dates crop, and has become one of the major markets for date imports in the world over recent years. By reviewing the statistics of the FAO in different years, the main sources of date imports to Russia are found to be Iran, Algeria, and Tunisia. It is expected that with the Western sanctions against Russia and its reciprocal action since 2014, the pattern of consumer preferences in this country will change. Therefore, it is important to study the rational behavior and preferences of Russian consumers towards domestic or foreign goods because it deals with the impact of shocks and policies in the form of structural failure or changes in people's preferences.
Materials and Methods: In this study, the sustainability­ and structural failure of the Russian consumers' preferences for dates crops was investigated using a non-parametric method based on the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP), Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP), and Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (GARP) and the hypothesis was tested. In order to investigate the sustainability­ of Russian consumers' behavior of dates, which is reflected in the import of dates from Iran, Tunisia and Algeria­, information about the value and quantity of dates imports to Russia was obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Then, by dividing the value of imports by volume of imports, the weighted average price of the Russian dates imported from each of the mentioned trading partners was calculated. It should be noted that the required information was available for Algeria from 2002 and for Iran until 2019, and also for Algeria and Tunisia until 2020. Therefore, the study period was selected from 2002 to 2020.
Results and Discussion: The study results of the WARP indicated that out of 171 pairs of the studied baskets, there were violations in seven pairs­. The study results of the SARP and GARP indicated that out of 171 pairs of baskets studied, 132 violations were observed in ­the data­. The calculated value of the Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) test from 2016 onwards (2019) was greater than the critical value at the level of five percent, and the zero assumption of structural change in the year in question was confirmed; and based on the WARP, there has been a structural change in the preferences­ of date consumers in Russia. The final results of calculating the K-W test based on the SARP and GARP showed that the structural change had occurred. The occurrence of structural change in Russian consumer preferences for the date commodity basket is not temporary due to a nonlinear impulse, but it is caused by a real structural change in the preferences of consumers in this country. The final results of calculating the W statistic based on the SARP and GARP showed that the structural change had occurred. The occurrence of structural change in Russian consumer preferences for the date commodity basket is not temporary due to a nonlinear impulse, but it is caused by a real structural change in the preferences of consumers in this country as well.
Conclusion and Suggestions: The change in Russian consumers' preferences about dates can be attributed to a combination of qualitative, marketing, and logistic factors. Although there have been no direct scientific studies on the preferences of date consumers in Russia, it can be seen that based on market analyses of imported products, it can be seen that packaging, product quality, and digital strategies play a pivotal role in attracting the customers. It is suggested that the government form a special working group for important export products such as dates, consisting of the Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad (MAJ), the Trade Development Organization, and the Exporters' Union, to implement and compile the necessary export standards in accordance with the needs of the Russian market within a certain period of time, and also by establishing an export guarantee fund with a specific initial capital to cover trade risks. and the launch of a specialized digital platform for direct communication between producers and date buyers in Russia. Success in the Russian market requires an integrated approach: from choosing the type of dates and attractive packaging to meeting health requirements and using digital tools. This strategy not only increases market share, but also helps to stabilize the position of Iranian dates in the global supply chain.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Dates
Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (GARP)
Koo Algorithm
Weak Axiom of Revealed ‎Preference (WARP)‎
  • Afriat, S. N. (1967). The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. Journal of International Economic Review, 8(1), 67-77. DOI: 2307/2525382.
  • Anokhin, I. A. (2024). Analysis of the dynamics and structure of foreign trade in products of the agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation. Buhuchet v sel skom hozjajstve (Accounting in Agriculture), 11, 783-796.
  • Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics. The Third Edition. Wiley, pp. 288-297.
  • Dehghan Dehnavi, M. A., Kohzadi, N., & Khalilian, S. (2005). Non-parametric test of revealed preference for rational behavior of consumers: urban households. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 7(24), 197-211. [In Persian]
  • Demuynck, T., & Seel, C. (2018). Revealed preference with limited consideration. Journal of ‎ American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(1), 102-131.
  • Dhar, T., & Foltz, J. D. (2005). Milk by any other name… consumer benefits from labeled American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(1), 214-228. DOI: 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00713.x.
  • Diaye, M. A., Gardes, F., & Starzec, C. (2008). GARP violation, economic environment distortions and shadow prices: evidence from household expenditure panel data. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, 3-33.
  • Dong, F., & Fuller, F. (2010). Dietary structural change in China's cities: empirical fact or urban legend? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 58(1), 73-91.
  • EEC (2023). EAEU trade statistics. Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC). Available at http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/econstat/Pages/default.aspx.
  • FAO (2020). Date import of Russia from Iran, Tunisia and Algeria. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Available at https://www.fao.org/.
  • FAO (2023). Russia as one of the world's major date import markets. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Available at https://www.fao.org/‎‏.‏
  • Fatahi Ardakani, A., Sakhi, F., Bostan, Y., & Rezvani, M. (2021). Structural break in preferences of Iranian urban and rural milk consumers. Agricultural Economics and Development, 29(2), 87-108. [In Persian]
  • Fatahi Ardakani, A., Rezvani, M., Bostan, Y., & Sakhi, F. (2022). Measuring structural changes in the preferences of consumers of imported cucumbers in the Russian Federation. Agricultural Economics and Development, 30(1), 231-254. [In Persian]
  • FCSR (2023). Foreign trade report. Federal Customs Service of Russia (FCSR). Available at https://customs.gov.ru/statistic.
  • Fevrier, P., & Visser, M. (2005). Measuring consumer behavior using experimental data. Available at crest.fr/pageperso/fevrier/fevrier-visser.pdf.
  • Fjaertoft, D., & Overland, I. (2015). Financial sanctions impact Russian oil, equipment export ban's effects limited. Oil & Gas Journal, 113(8), 66-72.
  • Fleissig, A. R., Alastair, R. H., & Seater, J. J. (2000). GARP, separability, and the representative agent. Journal of ‎ ‎Macroeconomic Dynamics, 4(3), 324-342.
  • Heigermoser, M., Götz, L., & Jaghdani, T. J. (2022). Russia's food trade with the Middle East and North Africa. Russian Analytical Digest, 275, 20-23.
  • Homayounefar, M., & Tavana, H. (2008). Application of revealed preferences methodology for testing rational behavior of rural households. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (QJER), 8(2), 119-132. DOR: 1001.1.17356768.1387.8.2.6.5. [In Persian]
  • Houthakker, H. S. (1950). Revealed preference and the utility function. Journal of ‎ ‎Economica, 17(66), 159-174. DOI: 10.2307/2549382.
  • Hovhannisyan, V., Kondaridze, M., Bastian, C.H., & Shanoyan, V. (2020). Empirical evidence of changing food demand and consumer preferences in Russia. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 52, 480-501.
  • IRICA (2023). Export performance to Russia. Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA). Available at https://irica.gov.ir/fa/page/1197. ‎[In Persian]‎
  • Jin, H. J. (2006). Verifying timing and frequency of revealed preference violations and application to the BSE outbreak in Japan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(1), 139-157.
  • Jin, H. J. (2008). Change in South Korean consumers’ preferences for meat. Journal of Food Policy, 33(1), 74-84.
  • Jin, H. J., & Koo, W. W. (2003). U.S. meat exports and food safety information. Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report No 23623, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics. DOI: 22004/ag.econ.23623.
  • Jin, H. J., Sun, C., & Koo, W. W. (2003). The effect of food-safety related information on consumer preference: the case of the BSE outbreak in Japan. Journal of ‎ ‎Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report, 506.
  • Kocoska, L. (2012). A non-parametric approach to the estimations of critical inputs to economic models based on consumption data. Doctorial Dissertation, PhD Tthesis, School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University.
  • Koo, A. Y. C. (1963). An empirical test of revealed preference theory. Journal of ‎ ‎Econometrica, 31(4), 646-664.
  • MCII (2023). India-Russia bilateral trade report. Ministry of Commerce and Industry of India (MCII). Available at https://commerce.gov.in/international-trade/trade-statistics/.
  • Mehrjou, S., & Shakeri Bostanabad, R. (2019). Investigating the changes in consumer preferences for solid and liquid edible oils (application of nonparametric test, case study: Fars province). Agricultural Economics and Development, 27(3), 1-21. [In Persian]
  • Mousaaei, M. (2010). Culture, consumption and fundamental principles. \Islamic Economics (Eghtesad-e Islami), 8(34), 125-150. [In Persian]
  • Niazi, Z. A. (2020). An Overview of SCO multi-lateral trade and cooperation. Journal of Peace and Diplomacy, 1(1), 01-06. ‎[In Persian]‎
  • Rezvani, M., Bostan, Y., Etghaei, M., Fatahi Ardakani, A. (2020). Investigation of changes in bread consumers' preferences in urban areas of Iran using WARP and SARP approaches. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 11(42), 187-214. [In Persian]
  • Salami, H., & Sadafi Abkenar, S. (2019). A non-parametric approach to specifying changes of preferences German consumers for the Iranian and U.S. pistachios. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 50(1), 79-95. [In Persian]
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour: an addendum. Journal of ‎ ‎Economica, 5(17), 61-71. DOI: 10.2307/2548836.
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Journal of ‎ ‎Economica, 15, 243-253.
  • Shishegari, T., Memarnejad, A., Ghaffari, F., & Hosseini, S. S. (2022). Impacts of sanctions on foreign trade analyzed with the gravity model approach: a case study of Iran and Russia. The Journal of Economic Policy, 14(27), 247-274. DOI: 10.22034/epj.2022.18064.2307. [In Persian]
  • Sporchia, F., Patrizi, N., & Pulselli, F. M. (2023). Date fruit production and consumption: a perspective on global trends and drivers from a multidimensional footprint assessment. Sustainability, 15(5), 4358. DOI: 10.3390/su15054358.
  • TSI (2023). Export data analysis. Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). Available at https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104.
  • Varian, H. R. (1982). The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Journal of ‎ ‎Econometrica, 50(4), 945-973.
  • Varian, H. R. (1983). Non-parametric Tests of consumer behaviour. The Review of Economic Studies, 50(1), 99-110. DOI: 10.2307/2296957.
  • Varian, H. R. (2005). Revealed preference. Available at http://www.ischool. berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2005/revpref.pdf.
  • Wegren, S. K. (2018). Russia’s food policies and globalization. Lexington Books.‎
  • Willa, R., & Płonka, J. (2024). European Union in the face of Russian aggression against Ukraine (2014-2023). Historia i Polityka, 48(55), 119-138.
  • World Bank (2021). Ranking of countries based on the area of agricultural land. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
  • WTO (2023). World trade statistical review. World Trade Organization (WTO). DOI: 10.30875/9789287074195.