Agricultural and Rural Economics

Agricultural and Rural Economics

Analysis of Economic and Social Factors Affecting the Political Participation of Rural People in Guilan Province of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
mohamad fakori 1
Reza Esfanjari Kenari 2
1 Bachelor student in Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural sciences, Guilan University, Guilan, Iran
2 Assistant professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural sciences, Guilan University, Guilan, Iran
10.30490/etr.2024.367302.1034
Abstract
Introduction: Increasing political participation is the concern of every political system, and identifying factors influencing the increase in participation is one of the most important strategies for managing and enhancing people's participation in elections. Political participation is considered as one of the major indicators of development. Rural people can have a decisive role in the administration of the country with their political participation. This study aimed at investigating the factors affecting the political participation of the rural people in the society.
Materials and Methods: The research was conducted in a survey method and its statistical population included all the residents of Upper Bijarbaneh, Lower Bijarbaneh and Nakhjir-Kalayeh villages. The sample size was calculated 348 people based on Cochran's formula. In addition, the impacts of variables such as gender, age, income, membership and activity in political institutions and organizations, marital status, employment status, parents’ education levels, and the amount of following the events through the national media (IRIB) on the political participation of the rural people were measured.
Results and Discussion: The study results showed that the level of political participation of rural people was relatively low; and among the studied variables, the age, membership in political institutions and organizations, marital status, employment status, parents' education levels and following the events through the IRIB were the most important variables and had significantly positive effects on the political participation.
Conclusion and Suggestions: According to the study results, the low level of political participation of rural people is a warning for Iran’s political future, and the rural youth’s despair about their future employment will cause their low political participation. Therefore, if serious efforts are not made to solve this problem, it will cause a gap between the government and the nation in the coming years.
Keywords
Economic and Social Factors
Political Participation
Guilan Province
Mann-Whitney Test
  1. Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94-108. DOI: 10.2307/1960445.
  2. Broadwell, W. (2006). Political participation. Georgia Perimeter College Rockdale/Newton Campus.
  3. Emamjomezade, S. J., Mahmoodoghli, R., & Isanejad, O. (2011). A study of relationship between religiosity and political participation of the students of Isfahan university. Research Letter of Political Science, 6(21), 7-34. [In Persian]
  4. Farahmand, M. (2014). A comparative study of the consumption values of working women and housewives in Yazd city and the factors affecting it. Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological, 12(39), 53-80. DOI: 10.22051/jwsps.2015.1481.‎ [In Persian]
  5. Golabi, F., & Hajiloo, F. (2012). Sociological review of political participation rate of women and some of social factors affecting it (case study in East Azerbaijan province). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 1(1), 173-200. DOI: 10.22059/jisr.2012.36552. [In Persian]
  6. Hajibabaei, N., & Rezaei, A. (2022). Providing a local model for NGOs empowerment. Development of Humanities, 2(4), 103-130. DOI: 10.22047/hsd.2022.182853. [In Persian]
  7. Milbrath, L. W. (1981). Political participation. In: Long, S. L. (eds) The handbook of political behavior, pp. 197-240. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3878-9_4.
  8. Nasiri, H., Kazemipour, Sh., & Kafashi, S. (2019). Investigating the demographic factors related to the political participation of the citizens of Mahabad city. Sociology Studies, 12(43), 45-69. DOI: 10.30495/jss.2019.667957. [In Persian]
  9. Nesbitt-Larking, P. W. (2010). The role of the media in electoral behaviour: a Canadian perspective. Policy and Society, 29(1), 53-64. DOI: 1016/j.polsoc.2009.11.005.
  10. Panahi, M. H. (2007), Sociology of women's political participation. Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2015.1280. [In Persian]
  11. Saki (2021). Investigating the role of the Aftab provincial network in the political participation of the people of Markazi province (Arak city). Media Studies, 15(4), 59-76. [In Persian]
  12. Sheikh Zakariaee, V., Mohammadi, O., Karimi, S. E., & Nafee, A. (2016). Investigation of the effective factors on women's political participation in Sanandaj. Journal of Woman in Culture and Arts, 8(4), 573-588. DOI: 10.22059/jwica.2016.61795. [In Persian]
  13. Tamizkar Mostaghim, M., & Abbasi, B. (2015). Examining the challenges of public participation in political and legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Political Studies, 8(29), 151-180. [In Persian]
  14. Van Deth, J. W. (2003). Measuring social capital: orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79-92. DOI: 10.1080/13645570305057.
  15. Vosoughi, M., & Hashemi, A. (2004). Villagers and their political participation in Iran: a case study of three villages of Booshehr. Social Sciences, 11(26), 109-140. [In Persian]
  16. Zarei, Gh., & Jorfi, A. (2020). The effect of socio-economic base on political participation (case study: Moher city). Social Sciences, 13(47), 59-78. [In Persian]